Education of Deaf and
Hard of Hearing Students, specially designed instruction for children who
have mild to profound hearing loss or who are deaf. Deafness can be defined two
ways, audio logically and culturally. These differing perspectives on deafness
often conflict, and they help explain some of the heated controversies that have
affected the field of deaf education throughout its history.
Physical, medical, clinical, and educational
definitions of deafness and hearing loss are similar. They are based on
audiological measurements of an individual’s ability to hear sounds of different
levels of pitch and loudness. Specialists compare these measurements with
average hearing levels to determine the extent of an individual’s hearing
loss.
People are referred to as hard of hearing if
their hearing levels are low enough to interfere with basic activities—such as
schooling—but not so disabling that they cannot understand speech. Those who
have difficulty understanding speech, even with hearing aids, are called deaf.
Cultural definitions of deafness, on the other hand, emphasize an individual’s
various abilities, use of sign language, and connections with the culturally
deaf community. This perspective of deafness does not compare hearing levels.
Instead, it views deaf people as being as capable as hearing people, different
in the language they use, but not disabled.
Deaf and hard of hearing children often
benefit from modifications in their educational environments. Because most
children learn the language of their parents simply by hearing it, some deaf and
hard of hearing children may struggle to learn spoken languages such as English
and may have difficulty speaking clearly. Difficulty with spoken language may
also make learning to read and write more challenging. Many of these problems
can be avoided by recognizing a hearing loss when it first appears—often right
after birth, if the child is born deaf.
If specialists determine hearing loss in a
child, changes should be made in the child’s environment to make language
accessible to the child at a very young age. Depending on the type and extent of
the child’s hearing loss, these environmental changes might include teaching the
child’s parents and other caregivers to use sign language or to use
cued speech, a system of manually “cueing” sounds that are not visible
for speechreading (lipreading). It also might include the use of hearing aids to
make speech loud enough for the child to understand it, or surgery to insert
cochlear implants, devices for receiving and transmitting information about
sounds to the brain. For many deaf and hard of hearing children, however, the
discovery of their hearing loss is not early enough to prevent some delay in
their acquisition of language. In addition, hearing aids and cochlear implants
may not convey sound well enough for some deaf children to understand
speech.
Approximately 61,000 deaf and hard of hearing students receive special education
services in the United States. Children who are hard of hearing usually attend
regular classes in their community schools. The modifications in their education
may consist of small adjustments, such as sitting in the front of the classroom
where it is easier to hear and to speechread the teacher. Hard of hearing
students might also have a person take notes for them in class. Education for
hard of hearing students sometimes includes supplementary services, such as
speech therapy to help the children speak more clearly and tutoring in subjects
in which the children missed information because they could not hear it.
Public education for deaf and hard of hearing children in the
United States began in about 1800. The first permanent school for them used sign
language for instruction. This school was established jointly by American
educator and minister Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, who was hearing,
and French educator Laurent Clerc, who was deaf. During the 19th century, more
and more deaf children were identified and the number of special schools for
deaf students increased. At the same time, increasing numbers of hard of hearing
children who attended community schools were identified.
Many of the special schools for deaf
children used sign language for communication and instruction. After the
founding of the first schools for the deaf in the 19th century, educators,
parents, and students began debating the best methods for teaching deaf
students. Some people believed that using sign language inhibited the ability of
deaf students to learn English. They advocated that teachers emphasize speaking,
speechreading, and the use of whatever hearing the child might have. Others
argued that sign language provided a means to make learning academic content and
English easier for deaf students.
By the early 20th century, the advocates for
speech and auditory training prevailed, and the use of sign language in schools
declined. By the 1970s, however, many schools began developing programs of
“total communication,” a method of speaking English and using sign language
simultaneously. Educators now debate whether total communication or the use of
American Sign Language (ASL) exclusively is most effective for teaching deaf
children. ASL has a grammar system so different from English that both languages
cannot be used simultaneously. However, supporters of ASL instruction believe
that it provides the best medium for presenting academic subjects to students
who cannot hear spoken languages. In addition, advocates believe that
instruction in ASL builds deaf children’s self-esteem and helps them to become
successful adults who also are members of the culturally deaf community.
I certainly agree to some points that you have discussed on this post. I appreciate that you have shared some reliable tips on this review.
ReplyDelete